Operational Control Architecture

Platforms Transfer.
We Formalize Control That Already Exists.

21+ years validated: Visual CRP doesn't replace Procore/BIM 360. Coexists with them to eliminate duplicate work while maintaining 100% contractual compliance.

94%
Savings vs full platform licenses
30s
vs 8-12 minute searches
$1.6M+
Hidden cost eliminated in 5 years
🧮 Calculate Your Specific Savings 🏗️ See Hybrid Architecture ✅ View 8-Year Validation
Recommended next step: See how hybrid architecture works
🏗️ View Architecture →
✅ Independently audited on $500M+ project ⚡ 2000x faster than cloud platform searches 🏗️ 8+ years coexistence with CONSTRUMANAGER proven 💼 21+ years document control experience 🔗 Coexists with Procore, BIM 360, Aconex, SharePoint

Hybrid Architecture: The Best of Both Worlds

Not replacement. Smart coexistence.

📋 Contractual Layer (Required)

Procore • BIM 360 • CONSTRUMANAGER

  • Function: Formal transfer and compliance
  • Users: 2-5 people (document control)
  • Cost: $1,200/user/year
  • Result: Contractual requirement fulfilled
↕️ Intentional Manual Integration

⚡ Operational Layer (Visual CRP)

Effective Control for Entire Team

  • Function: Operational control and productivity
  • Users: 60-80 people (complete team)
  • Cost: $22K one-time (unlimited users)
  • Result: Duplicate work eliminated

💡 Key Insight

The "manual integration" of 5-10 minutes daily is intentional. It maintains human judgment as the critical element while ensuring consistency between systems.

Common Document Control Challenges

The hidden operational reality platforms can't address

📊 Effort Duplication

Teams maintain parallel systems: formal platform + Excel for real work. 10+ hours/week/person wasted on duplicate entry.

⏳ Operational Delays

Document searches take 8-12 minutes vs the required 30 seconds. 10+ hours/day lost waiting for platform responses.

👥 Limited Adoption

Platforms used by only 2-5 people for compliance, not the 60-80 person team. Real work happens in Excel anyway.

💰 High Hidden Costs

Work duplication can cost $1.6M+ in 5-year projects. Hidden in "team productivity" budgets where it escapes scrutiny.

Economic Analysis: Visible vs Hidden Costs

80 people needing daily access

📄 Visible Costs (Platform)

5-year licenses (80 users): $480,000
Implementation/Customization: $150,000
Total visible: $630,000

👻 Hidden Costs (Duplication)

Excel/Platform duplicate work: $1,245,000
Slow searches (lost time): $401,250
Version/control errors: $250,000+
Total hidden: $1,896,250
Current Real Operational Cost
$2,526,250
5 years, 80 users
↓ 92% reduction
Visual CRP Hybrid Model
$202,000
Reduced platform + Visual CRP

🏦 Savings Breakdown

Platform license reduction (75% fewer users): -$360,000
Duplicate work elimination: -$1,245,000
Search time recovery: -$401,250
Total operational savings over 5 years: $2,006,250
📊 Your Savings Potential
Team size: +25 points (80 operational users)
Current platform: +20 points (Procore/BIM 360)
Project duration: +18 points (5 years)
Duplicate work: +15 points (10+ hours/week)
Score: 78/100 - High savings potential 🗣️ Speak with Specialist

Operational Validation in Real Projects

Not theoretical claims. Real project data from 21+ years.

🏆 Primary Case Study

Montegrande Dam ($500M+)

Duration: 8+ years
Contractual platform: CONSTRUMANAGER
Visual CRP users: 60+ daily
Documents controlled: 14,936
"Auditors accepted our hybrid model: CONSTRUMANAGER for contractual transfer, Visual CRP for operational control. The team used Visual CRP daily; the platform only for compliance."
Project Controls Manager
Montegrande Dam
✅ Validated

Palomino Hydroelectric ($400M+)

Coexistence with: CITADON (5 years)

Result: Project successfully completed with hybrid architecture.

🔗 In Operation

Santiago Monorail ($1B+)

Coexistence with: Procore

Status: Active implementation and continuous validation.

📋 Professional Validation

Ing. Piter J. Bonilla D.
CODIA 17378 • Civil Engineer (Dominican Republic)
21+ years document control experience

*Calculations based on real operational data from referenced projects. Complete audit information available under NDA for evaluation teams.

Critical Questions from Evaluation Teams

❓ "Does this replace our investment in Procore/BIM 360?"

No, and it shouldn't attempt to. Visual CRP coexists with contractual platforms. You reduce licenses from 80 to 20 users, maintaining compliance while the team uses Visual CRP for daily work.

Proof: Montegrande Dam uses CONSTRUMANAGER (2 people) + Visual CRP (60+ people) for 8+ years.

⚖️ "Do auditors accept this hybrid model?"

Yes, with proper documentation. The separation is clear: platform for contractual transfer, Visual CRP for operational control. Auditors validate results, not architecture.

Proof: Independent audits accepted model on $500M+ project.

🔗 "Is integration automatic or manual?"

Intentional manual (5-10 minutes/day). This maintains human judgment as the critical element. CSV export from platform → manual import when administrator decides.

Advantage: Human control preserved, consistency ensured.

Recommended Action by Your Role

Get specific information relevant to your responsibilities

👷‍♂️ For Field Superintendents

Need documents in seconds, not minutes.

⚡ Request Speed Demonstration

📊 For Project Control

Need to eliminate duplicate work and errors.

🔄 Specific Duplication Analysis

🏦 For Directors/CFOs

Need to reduce hidden operational costs.

💰 Detailed Financial Model

⚖️ For Legal/Compliance

Need to maintain contractual compliance.

📄 Hybrid Compliance Review